Selectively curated case-law commentary focused on the actual court outcome, legally relevant facts and practical implications. A ruling is not featured merely because it appears in a court bulletin.
These are analyses of publicly reported court cases, not matters conducted or won by Legal Actions. Outcomes depend on facts, evidence and the law applicable at the time. The law and later case law may change.
19 analyses
In BS-1202(k-23), the Supreme Court annulled a residence-permit refusal, requiring proper examination of the underlying evidence and proportionality.
In BS-60(k-22) the Supreme Court partly annulled registrations affecting a shared access road and ordered the registry to re-examine the underlying evidence.
A Supreme Court dispute involving a public procurement contract illustrates how the amount, calculation base and proportionality of a penalty may be contested.
A 2024 judgment shows why the precise warranty scope, defect notices and contractual conditions matter more than broad promises.
Supreme Court case ას-802-2024 analyses workplace logs, internal rules and proof of overtime claims.
Case ას-149-2022 considers a short fixed-term contract, continued work and the consequences of evidence gaps.
A Supreme Court interim-relief case illustrates the need to match protective measures to the claim and evidence.
Case ას-1015-2023 concerns access over another property and the procedural scrutiny required in property disputes.
An administrative Supreme Court case addresses the legal significance of accurately completed transport documentation.
A 2025 Supreme Court decision highlights the need to analyse contract payment terms and the legal effect of alleged premium default.
A Supreme Court defamation case illustrates why factual assertions, opinions and the context of publication should be kept distinct.
A 2018 Supreme Court ruling recognizing a Ukrainian commercial judgment shows why Georgian recognition is not a fresh trial on the foreign contract claim.
A Supreme Court decision distinguishes a company’s own tax obligations from possible personal liability of its director or members.
The Supreme Court scrutinised a lender’s refusal to engage with a realistic third-party repayment proposal before enforced sale of mortgaged property.
A property purchase dispute raises separate questions about repayment, contractual penalties, finance costs and proof of lost profits.
The Supreme Court examined whether a duty of supervision and supporting evidence justified liability for another person’s conduct.
The Supreme Court analysed the time period relevant to recalculating dependent support after a historical workplace-related harm.
This decision deals with suspension of employment, requested back pay and timing of a dismissal challenge after criminal proceedings.
The Supreme Court examined the statutory limits on reclassifying a lawful property transaction for taxation purposes.